Regional power-flow shifts after...

The shutdown of Pljevlja transforms Montenegro’s internal energy balance, but its implications extend...

Private wind producers in...

Montenegro’s power system is undergoing a quiet reordering of influence. Where state hydro...

Balancing costs in Montenegro’s...

As Montenegro steps into a future without Pljevlja’s coal-fired stability, the cost of...

Montenegro’s power future: Transitioning...

Montenegro finds itself at a key inflection point. The only coal-fired thermal power...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro: LNG terminal...

Montenegro: LNG terminal project faces ecological and economic concerns

The Montenegrin Ministry of Mining, Oil and Gas has announced plans to construct a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in Bar, part of the Adriatic-Ionian gas pipeline that aims to connect Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro through a hub in Albania. While the Ministry emphasizes potential economic benefits, stability in electricity supply, and geopolitical advantages, CEE Bankwatch raises significant concerns about the project’s ecological and economic viability.

Natasa Kovacevic from CEE Bankwatch argues that the project undermines commitments from the Paris Agreement and the Sofia Declaration to phase out fossil fuels by 2025. Montenegro’s lack of developed gas infrastructure, coupled with its non-dependence on gas, could position it favorably during global energy crises, especially given that major gas exporters like Azerbaijan are often deemed undemocratic.

The LNG terminal project is seen as a substantial financial undertaking, potentially leading to long-term debt. Kovacevic points out that Europe is actively reducing fossil fuel reliance, with a target of a 67% decrease, making Montenegro’s plans seem increasingly unjustified.

Additionally, the proposed terminal would be situated in a seismically sensitive area near residential zones and hazardous chemical storage, raising serious safety concerns. Introducing gas into Montenegro’s electricity network without a developed market or consumption infrastructure further complicates the project’s economic viability.

In light of these issues, CEE Bankwatch urges Montenegro to prioritize sustainable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, which are abundant and offer a more sustainable and profitable future.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Regional power-flow shifts after the Pljevlja shutdown: Montenegro in a rewired Balkan energy landscape

The shutdown of Pljevlja transforms Montenegro’s internal energy balance, but its implications extend beyond national borders. In the interconnected Balkan power system, every addition or removal of a major unit reshapes flows, congestion points, trade patterns and price correlations....

Private wind producers in Montenegro: From peripheral players to system-defining actors

Montenegro’s power system is undergoing a quiet reordering of influence. Where state hydro once dominated unchallenged and Pljevlja provided the stable backbone, private wind producers are emerging as system-defining actors. They are reshaping generation patterns, altering the economics of...

Balancing costs in Montenegro’s post-coal power system

As Montenegro steps into a future without Pljevlja’s coal-fired stability, the cost of balancing becomes the defining economic metric of its power system. Balancing is never a simple technicality; it is the financial manifestation of volatility. When wind ramps...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!