The Balkan grid at...

As winter settles across South-East Europe, the region’s electricity landscape enters a season...

The Balkan power mosaic:...

The final month of 2025 finds the electricity markets of South-East Europe entering...

Winter markets at the...

The western edge of the Balkan electricity system enters December 2025 with a...

Winter prices without the...

December 2025 opens the winter season in Central and South-East Europe with a...
Supported byClarion Energy

In order to save its electricity companies, Serbia will rely on Rystad

In order to save its power companies, Serbia will rely on Norwegian wisdom. More than that, the Norwegians are also interested in investing in Serbia, says the Ministry of Mining and Energy in response to questions from N1. Energy experts interviewed by N1 believe that it is not clear why the government chose Norway as a partner, since the electricity companies of the two countries are not compatible. They also warn that Serbia already has a bad experience with the introduction of foreign professional management in its companies.

The situation in the Electric Power Company of Serbia is such that the president in Oslo offered the Norwegian consulting company Rystad to enter the management structure of some energy companies.

“We even offered to send one of their people to take over the executive function, which of course they don’t do and don’t want to do”, said Aleksandar Vučić recently.

But what do the Norwegians want? The fact is that the president spent two days on an official visit to Norway, as well as having a reception with King Harald V, which all suggests how serious the intentions of the two sides are. The Ministry of Energy, in response to question N1 on cooperation plans, says that Norway introduced professional management in energy companies 30 years ago and that it has valuable experience.

“Their companies are interested in investing in our country, and some of them have been working successfully for 12 years. The first step is to decide which of the three system reform strategies we will implement. After that, the directions and details of the investment will be known,” the Ministry’s announcement reads.

However, energy analyst Miloš Zdravković says that the Norwegian and Serbian electricity companies are completely different.

“Norwegians have no experience with thermal power plants.” I would like to mention that Norway gets 96 percent of its electricity from hydropower plants…We get 70 percent of our electricity from thermal power plants, and I don’t see how the Norwegians can help us there”, said Zdravković.

Serbia already had experience with professional advisers who came to sort out our companies, energy expert Miodrag Kapor tells N1.

“Let me remind you that before privatization we brought Slovakian professional management to Železara Smederevo, so we had huge losses for our country. The mere announcement of the introduction of professional company management does not mean that something like that will happen”, says Miodrag Kapor.

Nevertheless, the Norwegian consulting company Rystad Energy, with which the Government of Serbia has established cooperation, is one of the most reputable consulting companies, and its founder Jarand Rystad gained his reputation by forecasting and advising the world’s oil giants that oil consumption will increase despite electric cars, thanks to unexpectedly high demand. in the chemical and petrochemical complex. That came true, N1 writes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia’s energy dilemma: EPS faces a slow-burning crisis amid calls for accountability

For decades, Serbia’s national utility, Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS), operated under the illusion of indestructibility. Its sprawling lignite mines, ageing thermal plants and hydropower dams formed the backbone of a system that appeared resistant to regional shocks, political storms and...

Serbia’s energy future at stake in post-Russia gas power struggle

For more than two decades, Serbia’s political and economic stability rested on a simple, unwritten assumption: Russian gas would continue to flow, reliably, predictably and at preferential terms negotiated quietly between Belgrade and Moscow. The relationship was never merely...

Sanctions on NIS trigger Serbia’s most severe financial stress test in a generation

When the United States expanded its sanctions targeting Russian energy interests, few policymakers in Belgrade initially grasped the magnitude of what was unfolding. On the surface, nothing had changed: Serbia’s biggest oil company, NIS, majority-owned by Gazprom Neft, continued...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!