Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsGreece revisits wholesale...

Greece revisits wholesale power surge despite no evidence of manipulation

This renewed scrutiny comes despite an earlier investigation by RAAEY, which did not find evidence of market manipulation or improper bidding. However, in light of ACER’s findings, the regulator will review market activity from June to September 2024, with a particular focus on days of extreme volatility. One of the key dates under examination is 4 September, when prices reached 942 euros/MWh. The new review will include a detailed reassessment of bidding patterns on the Greek Energy Exchange to determine whether any actions may have distorted price formation.

The Government is monitoring developments closely due to the political and economic sensitivities surrounding electricity prices. Industrial representatives, including EVIKEN chairman Antonis Kontoleon, view ACER’s intervention as confirmation of long-standing concerns over the structure and behavior of the domestic market. Electricity producers, however, deny any improper conduct, pointing instead to external factors such as cross-border flow constraints and the need to conserve hydro reserves.

ACER has since clarified its report, emphasizing that it did not conclude that manipulation occurred within the Greek market nor did it call for a formal investigation. The purpose of its analysis was to study how bidding behavior affected wholesale prices and to identify structural shortcomings in market functioning. The report noted symptoms of limited competition and encouraged regulators across southeastern Europe to review market conditions during the same period. References to practices such as capacity withholding were included as theoretical examples of potential manipulation, not confirmed cases.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Why OE-governed quality assurance is becoming the new currency of wind asset value in Southeast Europe

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed, often overlooked—becomes the defining currency of asset value. Southeast Europe is entering that moment now. Serbia, Romania, Croatia, and Montenegro are witnessing a scale-up in wind...

Insurance, force majeure and financial risk transfer — the new architecture of protection for wind investors in Southeast Europe

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily on EPC contracts, turbine warranties, and revenue support mechanisms. Insurance was treated as a formal requirement—necessary for lenders, but rarely integrated into strategic project design. That...

ESG, community strategy and social license — the hidden financial drivers of wind success in Southeast Europe

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical variables: resource quality, EPC pricing, grid access, and financing structure. But as markets mature, a new set of forces is emerging—less visible than capex or P50...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!