2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsGreece-Bulgaria interconnector operators...

Greece-Bulgaria interconnector operators sign MoU to harmonize gas quality standards across Southeast Europe

The operator of the Greece-Bulgaria interconnector (IGB) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with natural gas transmission system operators (TSOs) from central and southeastern Europe. This agreement aims to establish a unified approach for aligning gas quality standards at interconnection points throughout the region.

The MoU includes TSOs from Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, North Macedonia, Croatia, Moldova, Ukraine, Slovenia, and Hungary. Together, these operators are committed to collaborative efforts to strengthen energy security and facilitate a sustainable energy transition.

As part of the agreement, the TSOs will conduct an assessment by April 30, 2025, to evaluate the impacts of harmonizing gas quality standards on interconnection agreements within the central and southeastern Europe energy connectivity (CESEC) region. By this deadline, an action plan will also be developed, outlining the necessary steps and timeline for implementing unified gas quality requirements.

ICGB CEOs George Satlas and Teodora Georgieva emphasized that this initiative is crucial for optimizing existing infrastructure, achieving interoperability, and enabling diverse gas flows. The unified approach aims to enhance transparency for network users and is vital for supporting a sustainable and affordable energy transition, aligning with the EU’s vision of a fully integrated internal energy market.

In collaboration with the European Commission, CESEC TSOs are prioritizing the harmonization of gas quality at interconnection points to reduce reliance on Russian natural gas and increase the integration of alternative energy sources, such as the Southern Gas Corridor and LNG imports via Greece. Given the varying gas quality parameters of these new sources, standardization is essential to ensure compatibility across gas infrastructure and facilitate smooth cross-border gas trade and transport.

ICGB is already collaborating with TSOs in the region on several initiatives, including the Vertical Gas Corridor. The Greece-Bulgaria interconnector, which links Bulgaria to the Southern Gas Corridor, currently operates at a capacity of 3 billion cubic meters annually and has the potential to expand to 5 billion cubic meters, enhancing energy connectivity and security across the region.

At present, the interconnector supplies approximately 70% of Bulgaria’s domestic natural gas needs and serves as a reliable route for diversified gas supplies to major markets like Moldova and Ukraine. Historically, central and southeastern Europe have been heavily reliant on Russian natural gas imports, which have influenced quality standards across national networks and interconnection points.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas–power flexibility models for Serbian industries

Flexibility as a cost-control mechanism Flexibility has become the primary tool for managing gas-driven volatility. In the Serbian context, flexibility does not mean eliminating gas use but managing when and how gas and electricity are consumed. At the system level, flexibility...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!