2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergyGas–power flexibility models...

Gas–power flexibility models for Serbian industries

Flexibility as a cost-control mechanism

Flexibility has become the primary tool for managing gas-driven volatility. In the Serbian context, flexibility does not mean eliminating gas use but managing when and how gas and electricity are consumed.

At the system level, flexibility reduces exposure to marginal pricing. At the plant level, it allows producers to avoid purchasing energy during extreme price hours.

Steel and chemicals: Dispatchable load and self-generation

For steel and chemical plants, the most effective flexibility model combines dispatchable load management with self-generation. Processes that can be shifted outside peak price hours reduce exposure to volatility. Cogeneration units allow plants to convert gas directly into electricity and heat at predictable cost, insulating them from wholesale power spikes.

This model does not eliminate gas price exposure but transforms it from a market-driven risk into a managed operational variable.

Food processing: Fixed electricity, flexible gas

Food processors benefit most from fixed-price electricity procurement combined with seasonal gas hedging. Electricity price stability protects against the indirect effects of gas volatility, while gas hedging during peak seasons reduces downside risk without requiring continuous financial market engagement.

Ceramics: Gas storage and contractual flexibility

For ceramics producers, flexibility is harder to achieve operationally. The most effective model combines contractual gas flexibility with access to storage or linepack smoothing. While Serbia’s domestic storage access is limited, even partial buffering can reduce exposure to short-term price spikes.

Longer-term, ceramics producers may need to explore hybrid firing technologies or alternative fuels to reduce structural gas dependence, particularly under CBAM pressure.

Elevated by clarion.energy

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...

Sector-by-sector gas cost sensitivity in Serbian export industries

Steel: Gas as a volatility multiplier rather than a fuel cost In Serbia’s steel industry, gas sensitivity manifests less through average cost levels and more through volatility transmission. Gas is used directly for heating and indirectly via electricity consumption in...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!