The European Union’s electricity market reforms are often framed as a response to price volatility and political pressure. For Southeast Europe (SEE), however, the reforms serve as a long-term convergence engine, gradually reshaping how Serbia, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, and neighbouring markets align with the EU core. The question for the region is not whether convergence will occur, but how uneven and potentially disruptive the path will be.
At the center of the reform is a rebalancing between short-term spot markets and longer-term price stability mechanisms. Tools such as contracts for difference, expanded power purchase agreements, and revised capacity mechanisms are designed to stabilise investment signals in renewables and firm capacity. For markets like Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, which remain heavily exposed to merchant pricing, this represents a significant shift away from purely spot-driven price formation toward more structured hedging frameworks.
Hungary and Romania play a pivotal role in transmitting EU policy signals into neighbouring non-EU markets. When Hungarian generators secure long-term contracts under the new frameworks, the volume of flexible power available for spot exports to Serbia or Croatia changes. Spot liquidity tightens, and price volatility migrates, rather than disappears entirely, illustrating the indirect effects EU reforms can have on the region.
Serbia faces increasing pressure to accelerate market alignment. While the country participates in regional trading, its exposure to EU reforms is indirect, filtered through cross-border prices. As EU markets stabilise investment returns with long-term instruments, residual volatility concentrates in less-protected systems, precisely where Serbia, Bosnia, and North Macedonia currently operate. This can lead to wider spreads during stress periods, even as average prices gradually converge with the EU.
Montenegro and Albania, with hydro-dominated systems, experience the reforms differently. Their grids interact with EU changes mainly through balancing and scarcity pricing. As EU markets reward flexibility more explicitly, hydro exports during peak stress periods earn higher premiums, but domestic price volatility may also increase as local systems arbitrage regional scarcity.
Bulgaria’s situation is structurally complex. Nuclear and coal provide baseload stability, but EU decarbonisation rules gradually reduce coal’s role. As Bulgaria adapts capacity mechanisms and long-term contracting tools, its export patterns toward Greece, North Macedonia, and Serbia will shift. Periods of cheap baseload exports may give way to tighter availability during regional stress, changing long-standing trade flows.
Greece demonstrates how reform can amplify regional influence. Rapid renewable expansion, backed by EU contracts, stabilises investment but increases intraday volatility. Its system now exports price shocks as efficiently as it exports electricity. For Albania, North Macedonia, and Bulgaria, this means deeper market coupling, but also sharper transmission of price fluctuations.
Over the medium term, EU reforms accelerate SEE’s transition from fragmented national markets toward a layered regional system. Day-ahead prices will increasingly converge, but intraday and balancing spreads will remain wide where grids are weak or flexibility is scarce. Traders and investors who assume uniform convergence risk mispricing SEE assets; divergence within convergence will be the defining feature of the coming decade.
Elevated by virtu.energy
