2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsEBRD could decide...

EBRD could decide to end all fossil fuel investments

Between 2018 and 2021, the EBRD pumped EUR 2.9 billion in public money into oil and fossil gas projects around the world.

Now, public calls for the EBRD to stop backing the fossil fuel industry are growing louder. During public consultations on the energy strategy, the Bank received over 6200 emails demanding that it finally divest from fossil fuels. In late September, an open letter signed by Bankwatch and 130 civil society groups from over 40 countries urged the EBRD to join, not impede, the global effort to tackle the climate crisis. They called on the Bank to fully exclude support for fossil gas, including through financial intermediaries, and to increase investments in a just energy transition. 

At COP 28, the EU is lobbying governments to end all fossil fuel subsidies. The EBRD, in which EU countries hold a collective share of over 50 per cent, must not undermine this effort.

Yet, despite the Bank boasting that its activities are in ‘full alignment’ with the Paris Agreement, the draft strategy, released in July, indicates that the EBRD might in fact continue financing fossil gas projects, particularly pipelines and power plants. 

In recent years, the EBRD has gradually restricted its backing for fossil fuels and, based on its draft energy strategy, could impose new conditions on the financing of fossil gas infrastructure. Yet, despite warnings from the world’s top experts such as the IPCC and the IEA, the Bank’s shareholders appear determined to keep sinking public money into fossil energy.

Civil society groups call on the EBRD’s board of directors to acknowledge the climate emergency and ensure that the Bank’s next energy strategy ends all support for fossil gas.

Source: Bankwatch

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas markets as a structural cost driver for Serbian exporters

Natural gas has shifted from a relatively predictable industrial input to a structurally volatile cost driver across European markets. For Serbian exporters supplying the EU, gas price dynamics now shape not only operating costs, but also contract structures, risk...

What the European gas market means for Serbia-based producers and exporters

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium. Price formation, supply security, and cost competitiveness are no longer primarily dictated by long-term contracts and pipeline marginal costs. Instead, they are shaped by a volatile...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!