2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBulgaria: Parliament moves...

Bulgaria: Parliament moves to delay electricity market liberalization for households

The Bulgarian Parliament has approved two draft amendments to the Energy Act aimed at delaying the liberalization of the electricity market for household consumers. The proposals were introduced by Members of Parliament from the BSP – United Left and There Is Such a People (TISP) parties.

Under the BSP – United Left amendment, the liberalization would be postponed for two years. Meanwhile, TISP has proposed a longer five-year delay. A third proposal, introduced by the nationalist Vazrazhdane party, which called for a ten-year postponement, was rejected.

Dragomir Stoynev, leader of the BSP – United Left parliamentary group, emphasized the need for a critical political decision but criticized the lack of an impact assessment. He warned that lifting regulated electricity prices without proper safeguards could lead to severe social consequences and significant price increases. Stoynev also expressed concern over the absence of a clear strategy to shield households from potential negative effects.

Pavela Mitova, Chair of the National Assembly’s Energy Committee and a TISP representative, echoed these concerns. She stressed that removing price regulations would harm consumers and noted that the EU directive does not set a mandatory deadline for liberalization. According to Mitova, the Bulgarian Energy Ministry has negotiated flexibility with the European Commission, enabling the country to determine its own schedule.

To ensure a coordinated approach, a working group will be formed with representatives from all parliamentary parties. The group’s task will be to develop a balanced mechanism for implementing the liberalization process. The timeline established by this group is expected to differ from the ones proposed in the current amendments and will align with the government’s mandate—either four or eight years.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...

Electricity prices, production costs, and export competitiveness: What Serbian manufacturers face when selling into the EU

Electricity pricing has shifted from a background cost to a central competitive variable for Serbian export-oriented production. For companies selling into the European Union, power prices now influence operating margins, contract structure, carbon exposure, and long-term bankability. This is...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!