Slovenia: NPP Krsko exceeds...

In September 2025, the Krsko nuclear power plant, jointly owned by Slovenia and...

Romania: Electrica completes 27...

Romanian electricity distributor and supplier Electrica has completed the construction of the Satu...

Romania: NEPI Rockcastle launches...

NEPI Rockcastle, the largest owner and operator of shopping centers in Central and...

Bulgaria: Bulgargaz secures LNG...

Bulgaria’s state-owned natural gas supplier Bulgargaz has completed a tender to meet part...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBulgaria: Parliament moves...

Bulgaria: Parliament moves to delay electricity market liberalization for households

The Bulgarian Parliament has approved two draft amendments to the Energy Act aimed at delaying the liberalization of the electricity market for household consumers. The proposals were introduced by Members of Parliament from the BSP – United Left and There Is Such a People (TISP) parties.

Under the BSP – United Left amendment, the liberalization would be postponed for two years. Meanwhile, TISP has proposed a longer five-year delay. A third proposal, introduced by the nationalist Vazrazhdane party, which called for a ten-year postponement, was rejected.

Dragomir Stoynev, leader of the BSP – United Left parliamentary group, emphasized the need for a critical political decision but criticized the lack of an impact assessment. He warned that lifting regulated electricity prices without proper safeguards could lead to severe social consequences and significant price increases. Stoynev also expressed concern over the absence of a clear strategy to shield households from potential negative effects.

Pavela Mitova, Chair of the National Assembly’s Energy Committee and a TISP representative, echoed these concerns. She stressed that removing price regulations would harm consumers and noted that the EU directive does not set a mandatory deadline for liberalization. According to Mitova, the Bulgarian Energy Ministry has negotiated flexibility with the European Commission, enabling the country to determine its own schedule.

To ensure a coordinated approach, a working group will be formed with representatives from all parliamentary parties. The group’s task will be to develop a balanced mechanism for implementing the liberalization process. The timeline established by this group is expected to differ from the ones proposed in the current amendments and will align with the government’s mandate—either four or eight years.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

From Čačak to Europe: Nearshoring shared business services with regional talent and real connectivity

Čačak sits in the heart of Serbia with an asset mix that plays perfectly to near-sourcing: a deep regional talent catchment, motorways that cut transit times to major hubs, and operating costs that let you scale shared business services...

The new currency of trust: Where technical risk meets financial consequence

In modern infrastructure, oversight isn’t a paperwork ritual—it’s a translation exercise. Design choices, test results, and schedule slips must be converted into hard numbers a credit committee can act on. That alignment of technical risk with financial consequence has...

When ESG gaps halt financing: The Owner’s Engineer’s role in industrial projects

In industrial construction today, an ESG non-conformity can hold a loan tranche as effectively as a failed transformer test. Lenders and investors now expect the Owner’s Engineer (OE) to treat environmental, social, and governance risks with the same rigor...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!