Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina,...

Bosnia and Herzegovina, RS seeking foreign experts for HPP Vrbas arbitration

The Government of the Republic of Srpska (RS) has tasked state-owned power utility ERS to hire foreign experts for the arbitration procedure over hydropower plants on the Vrbas river, which it had lost in April, although is has no right for an appeal.

ERS said that the estimated value of the tender is around 40,000 euros and that the procedure is  ongoing. It should be noted that each month of delayed payment to Slovenian Viaduct will cost the Government additional 250,000 euros in interest.

The arbitration court in Washington ruled that RS has to pay 45 million euros to Viaduct due to the unilateral termination of the concession agreement for the construction of two hydropower plants on the Vrbas river.

In September 2016, Slovenian company Viaduct has filed a request to initiate arbitration procedure in order to seek compensation for damages caused by violating the provisions of the agreement on the protection of investments between Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as the provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty also signed by both Slovenia and BiH.

Slovenian investor, through its local subsidiary HES Vrbas, has concluded a concession agreement with RS Government on 25 November 2004 for the construction of two hydropower plants on Vrbas river (HPP Krupa with 48.5 MW of installed capacity and HPP Banja Luka with 37.2 MW), which was terminated on 29 September 2015 due to non -realization.

The request to initiate arbitration proceedings was sent to the International Center of Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in Washington. Viaduct seeks 51 million euros in compensation from BiH. Bosnia and Herzegovina is only legally sued because it is impossible to address the Republic of Srpska as respondent in the arbitration proceedings. The claim of 51 million euros is almost double the amount (23.5 million euros) which was initially claimed by HES Vrbas in late 2015.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Why OE-governed quality assurance is becoming the new currency of wind asset value in Southeast Europe

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed, often overlooked—becomes the defining currency of asset value. Southeast Europe is entering that moment now. Serbia, Romania, Croatia, and Montenegro are witnessing a scale-up in wind...

Insurance, force majeure and financial risk transfer — the new architecture of protection for wind investors in Southeast Europe

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily on EPC contracts, turbine warranties, and revenue support mechanisms. Insurance was treated as a formal requirement—necessary for lenders, but rarely integrated into strategic project design. That...

ESG, community strategy and social license — the hidden financial drivers of wind success in Southeast Europe

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical variables: resource quality, EPC pricing, grid access, and financing structure. But as markets mature, a new set of forces is emerging—less visible than capex or P50...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!