Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Insufficient coal for inefficient thermal power plants

Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) has become increasingly dependent on imported electricity due to insufficient coal production and outdated thermal power plants, says energy expert Almir Muhamedbegović. The country’s electricity generation has fallen by 15% from 2021 to 2024, and it now lacks enough power to meet domestic demand. As a result, electricity imports surged by 120% last year, reaching their highest level in six years. This trend continued into 2024, with imports in the first quarter exceeding the combined total of the previous five years.

The primary issue is the decline in coal production, with BiH’s seven state-owned coal mines producing significantly less between 2018 and 2023. This drop in coal production has led to a shortage of fuel for thermal power plants, which traditionally produce about 60% of the country’s electricity. The situation has been exacerbated by inefficiencies, corruption, and labor strikes within state-owned companies.

Private sector companies, such as EFT, have stepped in to fill the gap, with EFT owning and operating several thermal and hydroelectric plants, including the Stanari coal-fired power plant. Meanwhile, BiH’s three state-owned utilities—Elektroprivreda BiH, Elektroprivreda RS, and Elektroprivreda HZHB—account for the majority of the country’s electricity production, with the latter mostly using hydroelectric sources.

Despite these challenges, there has been little investment in new power generation infrastructure. This has led to the continued deterioration of older power plants, which are struggling to meet demand due to outdated technology and a lack of maintenance.

In the Federation of BiH, coal production in state-owned mines has dropped drastically, and concerns about mismanagement and corruption persist. The country’s energy sector is in crisis, and the government has acknowledged the need for urgent reforms and international assistance.

In the Republika Srpska, the situation is similar, with the state-owned Ugljevik power plant facing a shortage of coal after its coal supplier failed to meet obligations. Additionally, the thermal plants in this region are also aging and require significant investment to continue operating.

Overall, BiH’s energy crisis highlights the urgent need for modernization of its coal industry and power plants, as well as greater investment in renewable energy sources.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!