2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Controversy surrounds EP HZHB’s Poklecani wind farm project

The Poklecani wind farm, a nearly €200 million project by state-owned power utility EP HZHB, is expected to be financed through a loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB) and non-repayable grants from European Commission funds. Given these funding sources, the European Union Ombudsman has requested clarification from the European Commission regarding the project’s compliance with regulations.

From its inception, the wind farm has faced opposition from environmental groups. Authorities approved its construction through a government-issued decree, bypassing the requirement for an environmental impact assessment. Opponents argue that the project violates both domestic and European environmental laws and infringes on property rights.

EU Ombudsman spokesperson Honor Mahony confirmed that a complaint was filed in February, criticizing the European Commission for failing to address inquiries regarding the project. The Ombudsman has asked the Commission to respond to the complainants by March 10. If the response is deemed unsatisfactory, a follow-up request may be submitted, potentially triggering a new investigation.

The Western Balkans Investment Framework (WBIF), a joint initiative of the European Commission and six financial institutions, including the EIB, acknowledged concerns and stated that the bank is currently conducting a compliance review to assess adherence to environmental and social standards.

However, a group of local residents remains dissatisfied and has filed a new complaint with both the EU Ombudsman and WBIF. They have questioned the legal basis for expropriating private land and expressed concerns over the deforestation of 375,000 square meters of woodland. Additionally, they have announced plans to escalate the matter to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and other institutions to investigate potential legal irregularities linked to the project.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...

Electricity prices, production costs, and export competitiveness: What Serbian manufacturers face when selling into the EU

Electricity pricing has shifted from a background cost to a central competitive variable for Serbian export-oriented production. For companies selling into the European Union, power prices now influence operating margins, contract structure, carbon exposure, and long-term bankability. This is...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!