Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsRomania considers amendments...

Romania considers amendments to Oil Law, potentially stripping Lukoil of trident offshore concession

Romanian authorities are reviewing major amendments to the Oil Law that could remove Lukoil’s dominant position in the Trident offshore concession in the Black Sea.

Local media report that the government is evaluating options to either return the concession to state ownership or transfer operational control to Romgaz, which currently holds a 12.5% minority stake. The move is part of Romania’s effort to align its regulatory framework with US sanctions on Russian energy firms while remaining compliant with UN and EU obligations.

A draft emergency ordinance issued by the National Agency for Mineral Resources outlines the legal process for Romgaz to acquire Lukoil’s 87.5% interest in the concession. If enacted, Lukoil would lose its role in the exploration and development agreement, with full responsibility shifting to Romanian control.

Government documents suggest officials favor revoking Lukoil’s concession rights entirely and reallocating the stake to Romgaz. However, this approach raises challenges: Lukoil has invested hundreds of millions of dollars over the past fourteen years in exploration, drilling, seismic surveys, and deepwater development. The current draft does not provide a compensation mechanism, increasing the risk of international legal disputes.

The Trident block is considered one of Romania’s most advanced deepwater prospects in the Black Sea. Industry experts caution that removing a long-standing operator without reimbursement could conflict with bilateral investment treaty protections. Nevertheless, Romanian officials maintain that reducing exposure to Russian-controlled assets in strategic sectors is necessary given the current geopolitical and sanctions landscape.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Why OE-governed quality assurance is becoming the new currency of wind asset value in Southeast Europe

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed, often overlooked—becomes the defining currency of asset value. Southeast Europe is entering that moment now. Serbia, Romania, Croatia, and Montenegro are witnessing a scale-up in wind...

Insurance, force majeure and financial risk transfer — the new architecture of protection for wind investors in Southeast Europe

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily on EPC contracts, turbine warranties, and revenue support mechanisms. Insurance was treated as a formal requirement—necessary for lenders, but rarely integrated into strategic project design. That...

ESG, community strategy and social license — the hidden financial drivers of wind success in Southeast Europe

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical variables: resource quality, EPC pricing, grid access, and financing structure. But as markets mature, a new set of forces is emerging—less visible than capex or P50...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!