2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: EPBiH suspends waste-coal co-incineration project at Tuzla plant following public opposition

Bosnian state-owned power utility EPBiH has agreed to halt its experimental project that involved blending solid recovered fuel (SRF) and refuse-derived fuel (RDF) with coal at the Tuzla thermal power plant. The decision comes in response to a formal appeal from the Tuzla City Council, which demanded an immediate suspension of the co-incineration trial.

Members of the council voiced strong concerns over the lack of official information and transparency surrounding the project. They warned that co-burning waste materials with coal could emit dangerous and potentially carcinogenic substances into the air, endangering both public health and the local environment.

In a public statement, EPBiH confirmed that it would comply with the council’s request and suspend all activities related to the SRF/RDF co-incineration pilot at the Tuzla power plant. The utility emphasized its commitment to acting as a socially responsible company that adheres to national laws, respects community concerns, strives for improved environmental performance, and maintains open communication with stakeholders.

Just a month prior, EPBiH had defended the project, stating that adding up to 2% RDF to the fuel mix would not lead to higher emissions of key pollutants. The pilot initiative was carried out in cooperation with the Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism. EPBiH also addressed public doubts regarding the origin of the fuel, stating that the RDF was produced from locally sourced waste and had undergone chemical analysis at an accredited laboratory.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

What the European gas market means for Serbia-based producers and exporters

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium. Price formation, supply security, and cost competitiveness are no longer primarily dictated by long-term contracts and pipeline marginal costs. Instead, they are shaped by a volatile...

Policy without borders: How Montenegro–Italy coupling constrains domestic energy intervention

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its most profound effects are political. By linking Montenegro’s market directly to Italy’s, coupling effectively removes the border as a buffer between domestic energy policy and European...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!