Slovenia: NPP Krsko exceeds...

In September 2025, the Krsko nuclear power plant, jointly owned by Slovenia and...

Romania: Electrica completes 27...

Romanian electricity distributor and supplier Electrica has completed the construction of the Satu...

Romania: NEPI Rockcastle launches...

NEPI Rockcastle, the largest owner and operator of shopping centers in Central and...

Bulgaria: Bulgargaz secures LNG...

Bulgaria’s state-owned natural gas supplier Bulgargaz has completed a tender to meet part...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia: IMF warns...

Serbia: IMF warns of financial strain at Elektrodistribucija Srbije, urges fee adjustments for network upgrades

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has raised concerns about the financial stability of Elektrodistribucija Srbije (EDS), Serbia’s electricity distribution system operator. The IMF’s recent report highlights that insufficient network usage fees are weakening EDS’s finances, creating fiscal risks for the company. EDS, which was separated from the state-owned Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS) in 2021, relies heavily on loans from development partners backed by state guarantees to fund significant investments in modernizing its distribution network.

In 2023, EDS posted a loss of 9 million euros, a sharp decline from the 2 million euro profit recorded the previous year. To address its financial challenges, Serbia’s 2025 state budget includes provisions for two new loans for EDS. These include a 55 million euro loan from domestic and foreign banks for network improvements and 100 million euros from the European Investment Bank (EIB) to enhance the network’s reliability. Additionally, EDS will begin repaying 50 million euros in loans from OTP Bank and Intesa Bank starting in 2027, with a smart meter loan from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) due for repayment next year.

The IMF report notes that Serbian authorities are committed to reviewing the adequacy of EDS’s network usage fees. The Ministry of Mining and Energy, in collaboration with EDS, EMS, and EPS, will conduct a study on fee adequacy by March 2025. Based on the findings, a fee adjustment is expected to be implemented by May 2025, aiming to improve EDS’s financial health and enable essential investments in the distribution network.

In addition to addressing the financial situation at EDS, the IMF report also mentions Serbia’s progress in strengthening its gas sector. Efforts to separate Transgas from Srbijagas are on track, with the goal of finalizing the process with the Energy Community by 2025, in line with Serbia’s EU obligations.

Looking ahead, Serbia plans to update its Energy Investment Plan by March 2025, outlining investment needs, projected returns, and funding sources to support energy security and the green transition. The government also emphasized its continued commitment to developing a comprehensive green growth strategy, including preparations for the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which will involve the consideration of carbon pricing mechanisms such as carbon taxes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia as a re-export hub: Europe’s gateway to third markets

In an increasingly globalized supply chain environment, Serbia is emerging not only as an engineering and manufacturing base but as a strategic re-export hub for EU companies aiming to access third markets. By combining favorable trade agreements, geographic positioning, and a...

From Čačak to Europe: Nearshoring shared business services with regional talent and real connectivity

Čačak sits in the heart of Serbia with an asset mix that plays perfectly to near-sourcing: a deep regional talent catchment, motorways that cut transit times to major hubs, and operating costs that let you scale shared business services...

The new currency of trust: Where technical risk meets financial consequence

In modern infrastructure, oversight isn’t a paperwork ritual—it’s a translation exercise. Design choices, test results, and schedule slips must be converted into hard numbers a credit committee can act on. That alignment of technical risk with financial consequence has...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!