Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia, EPS requests...

Serbia, EPS requests that it no longer be a public company

The Supervisory Board of the public company “Elektroprivreda Srbije” adopted a proposal for a decision on the application of legal form to a joint-stock company, a proposal for amendments to the founding act, as well as a proposal for the Statute of the Joint-Stock Company.

These proposals were adopted in order for EPS to propose to the Government, as its founder, a change of legal form from a public company to a joint-stock company.

The adopted decision foresees that EPS will continue to operate as a non-public joint-stock company and will cease to operate as a public company.

The basic capital of EPS is converted into share capital, and the state becomes the absolute owner of all 36,510,509 shares.

The basic capital of EPS is 365 billion dinars. Of that, the monetary contribution amounts to 4.2 billion dinars, and the non-monetary contribution amounts to 360.9 billion dinars.

The expected effects of the change of EPS from a public company to a joint-stock company are the achievement of maximum business efficiency and the establishment of an efficient management and business management system. The change should also lead to a more rational use of personnel potential and more favorable conditions for more efficient market opening and development, according to the decision of the EPS Supervisory Board.

The Supervisory Board refers to several regulations in the section concerning the reasons for making the decision on the transition to a joint-stock company.

It is stated that the Government’s conclusion from November 2014 accepted the EPS Reorganization Program and that this Program foresees the change of legal form to a joint-stock company.

In addition, the Law on the right to free shares and monetary compensation that citizens receive in the privatization process , to which the Supervisory Board of EPS refers, prescribes that the Government is obliged to provide EPS with a change of legal form.

This law foresees that the Government provides EPS with a change of legal form and the declaration of the basic capital in shares within the deadline that has already passed, by the end of 2016.

Also, the Government adopted the Strategy of State Ownership and Management of State-Owned Businesses for the period from 2021 to 2027. The strategy, as one of the measures, defined changes in the legal form of public companies to AD or DOO, Nova Ekonomija writes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

The coming consolidation — how M&A will reshape the wind market in Serbia, Romania, Croatia and Montenegro

Every renewable market evolves through phases. The first is exploration, where early developers identify sites and navigate uncertain regulatory environments. The second is construction, marked by EPC competition, land acquisition, and turbine supply races. The third is operational optimization,...

Serbia breaks fuel import records in 2025 amid logistical challenges

Serbia has significantly increased fuel imports in 2025, bringing in more petrol during the first eight months of the year than in all of 2023 and 2024 combined, while diesel imports have also risen sharply. Tomislav Micović, Secretary General...

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!