Europe: Brent oil, TTF...

During the fourth week of June, Brent crude oil futures prices experienced a...

Europe: Electricity prices fall...

In the fourth week of June, average electricity prices declined across most major...

Europe: Electricity demand rises...

During the week of June 23, electricity demand rose across most major European...

Solar and wind energy...

During the week of June 23, solar photovoltaic (PV) energy production rose in...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeMiningPetition against Rio...

Petition against Rio Tinto lithium project in Serbia might lead to referendum

The Serbian government is prepared to hold a referendum to find out the will of citizens, Serbia’s president, Aleksandar Vucic, said while expressing his support for the project in a press conference June 4.

A petition calling for a ban on Rio Tinto’s Jadar lithium mine project and associated metal processing complex in the Jadar Valley because of pollution concerns has garnered more than 110,400 signatures in Serbia by June 10. The four-month-old petition drive, which is backed by a coalition of 19 NGOs, hit the 100,000-signature threshold June 9.

Lithium Jadar project is designed to produce 55,000 mt/year of battery grade lithium carbonate — for which global demand is growing in the electric vehicles and electronics sectors — as well as 160,000 mt/year of boric acid (B2O3 units) and 255,000 mt/year of sodium sulfate.

Referendum ahead

In December, Rio Tinto said when completed Jadar was expected to become the country’s second largest exporter. A feasibility study is expected to be complete at the end of 2021, and if approved, construction would commence in early 2022 and take up to four years.

“This year we are implementing a land acquisition program, which is a prerequisite for a construction permit,” Vesna Prodanovic, general manager of Rio Sava Exploration, said in March.

But not everyone is convinced about the project’s merits.

“I appeal to people not to sell their land and to think about the consequences. This part of Jadar and Radjevina has been inhabited for more than 8,000 years, and no one will force us out,” said Marija Alimpic, an activist with the Protect Jadar and Radjevina NGO, told Serbia’s TV Nova S on June 6.

Feasibility study

Prodanovic said that Rio Tinto still does not have an exploitation license, adding that the project is in the feasibility study stage.

“We can’t commence any works prior to the approval of the environmental impact study (EIS), a process that will last this entire year,” Prodanovic stated in an interview April 22.

The company is confident about the EIS process and expects to address all environmental concerns in the study that will be submitted to the Serbian government for approval.

Rio Sava Exploration, Rio Tinto’s Serbian subsidiary, was not immediately available for comment June 10. Rio Tinto’s exploration license reached the end of its life cycle in February 2020. Subsequently, the company applied for a retention license under Serbian regulations with the new permit covering an area of 66.8 square km (25.8 square miles), approved by the government in February 2020. It is valid until September 2021.

Role of public opinion

The new challenge to Jadar in Serbia is emerging in the wake of Rio Tinto’s promise to improve its cultural heritage policies globally and to ensure against the destruction of heritage sites of exceptional archaeological and cultural significance.

The commitment for greater sensitivity was made in the aftermath of Rio Tinto’s apology to the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura people (PKKP) in Western Australia, in which the company admitted that the destruction of 46,000-year-old Aboriginal Juukan rock shelters “was wrong.”

The destruction of the two Aboriginal caves in Pilbara caused a public relations debacle that resulted in the ouster of Rio Tinto’s then-CEO, Jean-Sebastien Jacques, in late 2020.

Mining in sensitive locations is becoming fraught with additional risk of regulatory clampdown. Rio Tinto experienced this recently after the U.S. Agriculture Department withdrew approval for the proposed Resolution Copper mine in Arizona after a public outcry that ensued following events in Australia.

Resolution Copper, 26 years in the making, was expected to have relatively little surface disruption as it is not a surface pit mine, but an underground mine like the proposed Jadar project.

Izvor: spglobal.com

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia grants operating license for new 350 MW unit at Kostolac coal power plant

The Serbian Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure has issued an operating license for the new B3 unit at the Kostolac coal-fired thermal power plant, marking a significant milestone in the country’s energy development. The license follows the formal handover...

Serbia: US Treasury grants NIS fourth 30-day sanctions reprieve

For the fourth time since April, the US Department of the Treasury has extended Serbian oil company NIS’s waiver from full sanctions implementation, pushing the new deadline to 29 July 2025. This extension follows NIS’s recent application for a special...

Serbia plans new gas storage facility amid EU energy tensions and supply uncertainty

As the European Commission pushes for a gradual phase-out of Russian energy imports by 2027, internal divisions threaten to derail progress. Hungary and Slovakia have strongly opposed the gas-related measures in the EU’s proposed 18th sanctions package, signaling they...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!