What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...

Storage and balancing economics...

The Montenegro–Italy electricity market coupling does more than integrate two markets. It reshapes...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia Energy2030–2035 scenario annex:...

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets

In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common.

Under this scenario, Serbian exporters without flexibility face chronic margin pressure. Steel and ceramics suffer the most, with frequent episodes of negative margins during peak energy price periods. Chemical producers encounter feedstock-driven cost shocks, while food processors experience episodic but severe margin erosion.

CBAM amplifies these effects by penalising emissions intensity and electricity-related carbon exposure. Export margins narrow not because Serbian production is inefficient, but because volatility itself becomes a structural disadvantage.

Scenario two: Stabilised supply, managed transition

In a stabilised LNG environment with sufficient supply and clearer regulation, gas prices remain lower and less volatile. In this scenario, Serbian exporters that invest in flexibility and energy integration regain competitiveness.

Steel and chemical producers benefit from predictable energy costs, while food and ceramics producers achieve margin stability through fixed-price electricity and partial electrification.

CBAM becomes a manageable compliance cost rather than an existential threat, allowing Serbian exporters to operate with greater certainty and strategic control.

Elevated by clarion.energy

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Gas–power flexibility models for Serbian industries

Flexibility as a cost-control mechanism Flexibility has become the primary tool for managing gas-driven volatility. In the Serbian context, flexibility does not mean eliminating gas use but managing when and how gas and electricity are consumed. At the system level, flexibility...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...

Sector-by-sector gas cost sensitivity in Serbian export industries

Steel: Gas as a volatility multiplier rather than a fuel cost In Serbia’s steel industry, gas sensitivity manifests less through average cost levels and more through volatility transmission. Gas is used directly for heating and indirectly via electricity consumption in...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!