Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Republic of Srpska faces new €50 million arbitration over Ugljevik electricity dispute

After settling its debts to the company Viaduct, the Republic of Srpska (RS) is now facing another arbitration case in Washington, this time valued at over 50 million euros. The dispute has been initiated by the Slovenian company Elektrogospodarstvo against the RS, and by extension Bosnia and Herzegovina, over the failure to deliver electricity from the Ugljevik thermal power plant (TPP Ugljevik).

The joint investment agreement between Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, signed during the former Yugoslav period for the construction of two coal-fired units at Ugljevik, was neglected by Bosnian authorities for years. This oversight led to arbitration proceedings in both Belgrade and Washington, raising concerns that a repeat of past costly disputes could occur.

Opposition members in the RS National Assembly argue that such negligence has direct consequences for citizens, emphasizing that the financial burden of these disputes falls on taxpayers. They contend that funds spent on international litigation could have been used for pensions, salaries, child benefits, infrastructure, and education.

Management at the Ugljevik coalmine and thermal power plant rejects these criticisms, asserting that efforts are ongoing to resolve the case and that the outcome will not mirror the Viaduct situation. However, the potential financial liability remains unclear, as company officials emphasize that negotiations are confidential.

In 2016, the RS Government signed an agreement with the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, committing to cover any damages should the case be lost. Nevertheless, there remains the possibility that RS authorities could refuse to honor these obligations, as has happened previously. Former state legal representatives warn that the case could again become a lengthy and costly process, imposing additional expenses on both the entity and the state.

The previous arbitration between Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina resulted in a ruling against RS and BiH for approximately 125 million euros. In addition, Ugljevik was required to pay Slovenia another 65 million euros for undelivered electricity for the period from 2022 to 2024.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!